6/3/2013 5TH DCA OPINION RE: DEPOSITION OF ATTORNEY BENJAMIN CRUMP

The following opinion was entered by the Fifth District Court of Appeal regarding the deposition of Attorney Benjamin Crump by counsel for George Zimmerman. You can read the opinion by clicking HERE

5/13/13 State of Florida Motions Filed

Motion For Protective Order/Motion in Limine Regarding Toxicology Filed 5/13/13
Motion For Protective Order/Motion in Limine Regarding Toxicology

Motion to Limit/Exclude Improper Opinion Evidence Filed 5/13/13
Motion to Limit/Exclude Improper Opinion Evidence

Motion In Limine Regarding Self-Serving Hearsay Statements of Defendant Filed 5/13/13
Motion In Limine Regarding Self-Serving Hearsay Statements of Defendant

Motion in Limine Regarding Prior Criminal History Filed 5/13/13
Motion in Limine Regarding Prior Criminal History

Motion in Limine Regarding Calling of Witnesses Filed 5/13/13
Motion in Limine Regarding Calling of Witnesses

Motion in Limine Regarding Opinion As To Appropriate Penalty Or Disregard of Law Filed 5/13/13
Motion in Limine Regarding Opinion As To Appropriate Penalty Or Disregard of Law

Motion in Limine Regarding Trayvon Martin Filed 5/13/13
Motion in Limine Regarding Trayvon Martin

4/29/13 Proposed Respondent Benjamin L. Crump, Esq.’s Response to Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

Proposed Respondent Benjamin L. Crump, Esq.’s Response to Petition For Writ Of Certiorari that was filed with the Fifth District Court of Appeals on 4/29/2013 by Bruce Blackwell, Esq. and Shayan Modarres, Esq. on behalf of Benjamin Crump, Esq.:

5th DCA Response of Proposed Respondent B. Crump

5th DCA Motion for Leave to Respond

5th DCA Index to and Supp. App.

4/24/2013 State’s Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari

The following Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed by the State in response to Defendant’s Petition.

2013 04-24 State’s RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Certiorari

4/13/13 Official Statement From Attorney Crump re: Fired Port Canaveral Sergeant

“It is absolutely reprehensible that a high-ranking member of the Port Canaveral Police, sworn to protect and serve Floridians, would use the image of a dead child as target practice. Such a deliberate and depraved indifference to this grieving family is unacceptable. The citizens of Port Canaveral deserve better.”

4/12/2013 Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Unseal

The following Motion was filed by Benjamin Crump in the Circuit Court on 4/12/2013

Motion to Determine Conf. of Court Records in Opp to Def Motion to Unseal

Statement From Trayvon Martin’s Family and Their Attorneys

April 11, 2013

Statement from Trayvon Martin’s Family and their Attorneys

One year ago today, the State of Florida decided that there was evidence to charge George Zimmerman for second-degree murder for profiling, pursuing, and killing our unarmed teenage son. The facts of this case are simple and straightforward. We are confident that a jury following the overwhelming evidence against George Zimmerman will hold him accountable for killing our son, Trayvon Martin.

For the Zimmerman family to allege that the justice system doesn’t work, simply because they are unhappy their son was arrested in the first place, is disingenuous and disrespectful to the very system that is currently affording him every available opportunity to defend himself. The arrest of an admitted killer is not a violation of due process, it is due process. Most will agree that no one has been given greater consideration by the justice system for killing an unarmed child, than George Zimmerman.

We continue to pray that our son’s death will serve as a catalyst in preventing other senseless acts of gun violence.

STATE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS

Bernie De La Rionda’s response to the Defense’s Motion for sanctions against the State Attorneys Office for alleged discovery violations

STATE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS

JUDGE NELSON’S ORDER DENYING DEFENSE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING DEPOSITION OF BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQ.

JUDGE NELSON’S ORDER DENYING DEFENSE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING DEPOSITION OF BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQ.

BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQ’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DATED MARCH 15, 2013

Click here for Benjamin Crump’s response to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration: BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQ’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DATED MARCH 15, 2013