6/3/2013 5TH DCA OPINION RE: DEPOSITION OF ATTORNEY BENJAMIN CRUMP
The following opinion was entered by the Fifth District Court of Appeal regarding the deposition of Attorney Benjamin Crump by counsel for George Zimmerman. You can read the opinion by clicking HERE
4/24/2013 State’s Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari
The following Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed by the State in response to Defendant’s Petition.
2013 04-24 State’s RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Certiorari
STATE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS
Bernie De La Rionda’s response to the Defense’s Motion for sanctions against the State Attorneys Office for alleged discovery violations
BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQ’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DATED MARCH 15, 2013
Click here for Benjamin Crump’s response to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration: BENJAMIN CRUMP, ESQ’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DATED MARCH 15, 2013
DEFENSE’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE OF FLORIDA
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) established the Brady disclosures that prosecutors must make to defense counsel in a criminal prosecution. Disclosures consists of potentially exculpatory or impeaching information and evidence that is material to the guilt or innocence of the defendant.
Did the State fail to disclose material evidence or exculpatory evidence, or is this just another attempt at diverting attention away from the defendant out of desperation?
Click here to read the Defense’s Motion: DEFENSE’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE OF FLORIDA
NBC UNIVERSAL RESPONSE TO ZIMMERMAN SUIT
Excerpts From NBC Universal’s February 20, 2013 Motion to Stay Proceedings Filed in Response to Zimmerman Civil Suit:
2/20/2013 DEFENDANT NBC UNIVERSAL’S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
Recent Comments: